The ashes is over. The pendulum swung thousands of times before finally settling in England's camp. The Urn has returned to England. Margin is as small as it can be over full five results. Had there been a scale to measure flaws in both teams, It would have surpassed the scale. One team initiating to take the advantage, other team just giving themselves in without giving a fight. Innings win followed by innings defeat. Hard to believe where the momentum was lurking. Only five individual centuries scored by three of the guys across both teams.
It is even weirder that three of the top run makers and four of the top five wicket-takers were Australians and still Australia ended up on being on the wrong side. In ters of number of balls bowled, it was the lowest after 1903. Australia opening partnership was more than 50, while England was around mere 25. Both sides happened to collapse on dozen of times. It was hard to believe what was happening in the middle. Ben Stokes looked like a duck magnet and fantastic batsman on almost every alternate occasion.
Hard to pick the best and the worst eleven separately. For example, You will have a hard time whether blokes like Starc, Johnson, Moeen belong to the best or worst team of this Ashes. None of the five matches went into five days. It raises the questions over the extent of impact T20 cricket had made over test cricket.
It was truly a series of England bowlers. Broad 8 wickets for 15 runs in one innings, Anderson, Finn and Stokes all taking 6-for. All of them striking when England needed them. England managed to win the important moments which reflects in the result. In many of those ways, it was like 2013 Ashes. But Australia had failed to win a single game that time.
This series also brought an end to one of the best captains Australia have ever produced, pup to retirement. Along with him, the reliable Rogers wore the baggy green also for the last time in Oval. Both of them departing with a big win at oval and big loss of Ashes. Many of the Australians may also have played their last games too. It will be interesting to see if Watson, Haddin, Voges, Siddle are in future plans of Australia or not.
Steve Smith made runs in Lords and Oval as if he loved London and only London. Other than there, he failed to reach even a half century. With each hundred he made, It brought failure of Joe Root in the same game. Alternately, when Root flourished, Smith failed. It was as if success of one brought the fall of the other. :P
It was certainly not a vintage series. A vintage series requires hard fought centuries, five wicket hauls in adverse conditions, building great partnerships both in batting and bowling. There was seldom of that in this ashes. There was no defiance and will to bounce back in either of the teams.
Is it too much of ashes cricket? Fifteen Ashes tests have been held in last 36 months. Are the players fed up? Hard to know. In many ways, it was a memorable and forgettable ashes. For me, I was pleased with the way England regained the Urn after 599 days when they were humiliated in Sydey. Now it is time to relax and wait till next time both of these sides meet. ciao.
It is even weirder that three of the top run makers and four of the top five wicket-takers were Australians and still Australia ended up on being on the wrong side. In ters of number of balls bowled, it was the lowest after 1903. Australia opening partnership was more than 50, while England was around mere 25. Both sides happened to collapse on dozen of times. It was hard to believe what was happening in the middle. Ben Stokes looked like a duck magnet and fantastic batsman on almost every alternate occasion.
Hard to pick the best and the worst eleven separately. For example, You will have a hard time whether blokes like Starc, Johnson, Moeen belong to the best or worst team of this Ashes. None of the five matches went into five days. It raises the questions over the extent of impact T20 cricket had made over test cricket.
It was truly a series of England bowlers. Broad 8 wickets for 15 runs in one innings, Anderson, Finn and Stokes all taking 6-for. All of them striking when England needed them. England managed to win the important moments which reflects in the result. In many of those ways, it was like 2013 Ashes. But Australia had failed to win a single game that time.
This series also brought an end to one of the best captains Australia have ever produced, pup to retirement. Along with him, the reliable Rogers wore the baggy green also for the last time in Oval. Both of them departing with a big win at oval and big loss of Ashes. Many of the Australians may also have played their last games too. It will be interesting to see if Watson, Haddin, Voges, Siddle are in future plans of Australia or not.
Steve Smith made runs in Lords and Oval as if he loved London and only London. Other than there, he failed to reach even a half century. With each hundred he made, It brought failure of Joe Root in the same game. Alternately, when Root flourished, Smith failed. It was as if success of one brought the fall of the other. :P
It was certainly not a vintage series. A vintage series requires hard fought centuries, five wicket hauls in adverse conditions, building great partnerships both in batting and bowling. There was seldom of that in this ashes. There was no defiance and will to bounce back in either of the teams.
Is it too much of ashes cricket? Fifteen Ashes tests have been held in last 36 months. Are the players fed up? Hard to know. In many ways, it was a memorable and forgettable ashes. For me, I was pleased with the way England regained the Urn after 599 days when they were humiliated in Sydey. Now it is time to relax and wait till next time both of these sides meet. ciao.